The Sethi Ledger

People · Practice · Possibility

Independent research for education leaders

Technology Section

September 5–11, 2026Download PDF Edition
This edition at a glance 9 selections
  • AI safeguards are moving from principles into enforceable terms. Microsoft’s national agreement and California’s new student-data law provide concrete language districts can adapt for procurement.
  • Cyber resilience is now inseparable from student safety. Springfield’s four-day closure shows that losing access to health records—not instructional systems—can determine whether schools can open.
  • “Free AI” does not mean cost-free adoption. Missouri’s statewide Google agreement eliminates licensing costs but leaves districts responsible for integration, governance, training, support and vendor concentration.
Actions for leaders

Act now

Compare current AI contract language with the Microsoft/AFT standard and California AB 1159.

Run a health-record and family-communications downtime exercise.

Issue special-education AI guidance covering redaction, verification and approved tools.

Investigate

Quantify E-rate exposure by service category and prepare evidence for an October filing.

Establish application-level device-use and value metrics.

Require critical-patch escalation and inactive-data deletion evidence from high-risk vendors.

Watch

Whether other major AI vendors accept Microsoft-equivalent contractual remedies.

Implementation and litigation around California’s new child-technology laws.

Independent replication of Jordan’s reported AI outcomes.

Sources & selection notes

This briefing brings together reporting, primary announcements, and leadership analysis. Sources are linked in each story. Cost, service, risk, and adoption assessments are editorial judgments; announcements and reported outcomes should be weighed against the evidence and limitations described.

Past editions

Explore recent editions from this section.

“A more thoughtful
future for every learner.”